<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Same River Twice &#187; Programming languages</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blackfez.com/tags/programming-languages/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blackfez.com</link>
	<description>A Feztival of Fun</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:49:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Dynamic Languages Strike Back</title>
		<link>http://www.blackfez.com/2008/05/13/dynamic-languages-strike-back/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blackfez.com/2008/05/13/dynamic-languages-strike-back/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 14:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fezboy!</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Deep Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Programming languages]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackfez.com/?p=121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steveys Blog Rants: Dynamic Languages Strike Back is a great article. Or at least it reads like a great article. To be honest, I don&#8217;t have the chops to voice a truly knowledgeable opinion but I figure if I keep reading this stuff it will come to me eventually. It all relates to a paradigm [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://steve-yegge.blogspot.com/2008/05/dynamic-languages-strike-back.html">Steveys Blog Rants: Dynamic Languages Strike Back</a> is a great article.  Or at least it reads like a great article.  To be honest, I don&#8217;t have the chops to voice a truly knowledgeable opinion but I figure if I keep reading this stuff it will come to me eventually.  </p>
<p>It all relates to a paradigm I and my first mentor skirmished over a bit.  He was old school and in to sucking every bit of processing out of a single command as possible.  I, being much less experienced, would write code that was a bit more human readable but also less direct, less elegant.  To be sure, I greatly admire elegant code and strive for it myself but I also recognize that processors have a little overhead when it comes to dealing with most tasks so why not use it?</p>
<p>Bringing it all around then, the essay deals with how dynamic languages are becoming competitive with static typed languages when considering the application as a whole.  Improvements in hardware, compilers, and runtime engines plus smaller code bases and quicker prototyping make dynamic languages attractive.  </p>
<p>Of course, he&#8217;s pushing for Lisp while I&#8217;m pretty happy with Python.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blackfez.com/2008/05/13/dynamic-languages-strike-back/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

